The cost of ignoring International Law would Place the world at risk: Why International Law must remain the cornerstone of global order
by admin on | 2025-03-06 09:25:50 Last Updated by admin on 2025-03-28 10:03:18
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 65
In an era marked by resurgent nationalism, the rise of right-wing populism in Europe, and the erratic foreign policy of United States President Donald Trump, the foundations of international law are under unprecedented threat. The world is witnessing a dangerous shift away from the rules-based international order that has underpinned global stability since the end of World War II. This shift is not merely a theoretical concern; it is a tangible threat to peace, security, and prosperity. The cost of ignoring international law would be catastrophic, plunging the world into a state of chaos where might makes right, and the vulnerable are left to fend for themselves. In this editorial, we will explore why international law must remain the cornerstone of global order, particularly in light of the challenges posed by nationalism, American exceptionalism, and the erosion of multilateralism.
The foundations of international law
International law is the bedrock of the modern global order. It is a system of rules and principles that govern the relations between states, ensuring that disputes are resolved peacefully, that human rights are EDITORIAL Ignoring international law can have significant and far-reaching consequences for countries, organizations, and individuals. International law is a body of rules and principles that governs relations between sovereign states, international organizations, and, in some cases, individuals. It covers a wide range of areas, including human rights, trade, environmental protection, armed conflict, and diplomacy. 8 MARCH 2025 protected, and that global challenges such as climate change, terrorism, and pandemics are addressed collectively. The United Nations Charter, the Geneva Conventions, the International Criminal Court, and a host of other treaties and institutions form the backbone of this system. These legal frameworks were established in the aftermath of World War II, a period marked by the horrors of genocide, total war, and the use of nuclear weapons. The architects of the post-war order recognized that without a system of international law, the world would be condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past. International law is not perfect, and it has often been criticized for being slow, cumbersome, and biased in favor of powerful states. However, it is the best system we have for managing the complexities of international relations. It provides a common language and a set of norms that allow states to cooperate, even when their interests diverge. It offers a framework for holding states and individuals accountable for violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. And it provides a mechanism for resolving disputes without resorting to violence.
The rise of nationalism and the threat to international law
In recent years, however, the principles of international law have come under attack from a resurgent nationalism that prioritizes narrow national interests over global cooperation. This trend is particularly evident in Europe, where right-wing populist parties have gained significant political traction. Parties such as the National Rally in France, the Alternative for Germany (AfD), and the Law and Justice Party in Poland have capitalized on fears of immigration, economic inequality, and the loss of national sovereignty to push an agenda that is deeply skeptical of international institutions and legal frameworks
